In a significant victory for the Georgia Republican Party, a federal judge in Georgia, U.S. District Judge Steve Jones, has approved newly redrawn congressional maps, dismissing claims from three separate lawsuits that the revisions inadequately address the needs of black voters. The decision follows a special legislative session called to address concerns raised by Judge Jones, an appointee of President Barack Obama, who had previously ruled that the 2021 maps illegally diluted the votes of black voters.
Obama appointed Judge Jones has ruled that the Republican drawn maps from the Special Session “fully complied” with his order to redraw the districts. The counties can now safely begin the redistricting process and we have a clear path for the ‘24 election-Gabriel Sterling
Judge Jones, in orders filed on December 28 at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, expressed satisfaction with the creation of new majority-black voting districts, stating that it resolved the issue of illegal minority vote dilution. The three lawsuits involved are Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity v. Brad Raffensperger, Coakley Pendergrass v. Brad Raffensperger, and Annie Lois Grant v. Brad Raffensperger.
The revised maps, as mandated by the judge’s October order, include the addition of black-majority districts, both at the congressional level and seven in the Georgia state House and Senate. Despite this effort to address concerns, the redrawn maps also lean in favor of the Republican Party, which currently holds a majority in Georgia’s General Assembly.
A federal judge in Georgia signed off Thursday on congressional districts redrawn this month by the state’s Republican-led legislature, ruling that the new map did not continue to illegally dilute the power of Black voters as critics have argued. https://t.co/1ouBc8mcvt
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) December 28, 2023
While the judge acknowledged that the GOP-controlled General Assembly redrew maps to politically protect the majority party, he emphasized that federal judges lack the authority to redistribute power between political parties. Consequently, he overruled objections from the plaintiffs and approved the new maps.
A notable consequence of this decision is the virtual elimination of the current minority-heavy 7th U.S. Congressional District, represented by Democrat U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath. In response, McBath expressed her intention to challenge the court’s decision or consider running for re-election in a different district.
Breaking News: A federal judge in Georgia has approved a congressional map redrawn by the state's GOP-led legislature after its original voting lines were found to be drawn in violation of federal voting rights law. https://t.co/XyiboTzlne
— CBS News (@CBSNews) December 28, 2023
The ruling drew divergent reactions from political figures, with Georgia House Speaker Jon Burns, a Republican, describing it as a “validation” of their efforts. On the other hand, Georgia state Senate Minority Leader Gloria Butler, a Democrat, strongly disagreed, asserting that the Republican-drawn maps discriminate against Black voters.
The redrawing of districts in Georgia is part of a broader national trend in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s June decision, which affirmed a district court’s ruling that Alabama’s congressional map likely violated the Voting Rights Act. The Supreme Court emphasized that race can be considered in the redistricting process, leading to a subsequent federal appeals court ruling in November that restricted private citizens and entities from filing lawsuits under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
BREAKING: Federal judge accepts redrawn Georgia congressional and legislative districts that will favor GOP https://t.co/ZeL1mkoZ1v
— The Associated Press (@AP) December 28, 2023
The decision by the 8th circuit appeals court sparked varied reactions, with some conservatives calling for the abolishment of Section 2 entirely, while others argued that it is applied to the benefit of every race except whites. Meanwhile, left-leaning groups like Democracy Docket denounced the ruling as “catastrophic.”
Across the United States, legal challenges to congressional district maps are underway in various states, including Kentucky, Louisiana, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. The Georgia case adds to the ongoing national conversation about the intersection of redistricting, racial representation, and the legal framework governing such processes.
#NEW: A federal judge has upheld Georgia’s new state legislative and congressional maps.
The redistricting plans will likely be the maps used in the 2024 election. https://t.co/wNWw8z5GYD pic.twitter.com/Tk6TDhl1Rj
— The Redistrict Network (@RedistrictNet) December 28, 2023
Major Points Discussed:
- U.S. District Judge Steve Jones in Georgia has approved new Republican-drawn congressional maps following three lawsuits challenging their impact on black voters.
- The judge acknowledged that the creation of new majority-black voting districts addressed concerns of illegal minority vote dilution, leading to his approval of the redrawn maps.
- Despite adding black-majority districts, the revised maps also favor the Republican Party, which holds a majority in Georgia’s General Assembly.
- Democrat U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath’s district is virtually eliminated, prompting her to consider legal challenges or re-election in a different district.
- The redistricting decision in Georgia is part of a broader national trend following the U.S. Supreme Court’s affirmation that race can be considered in the redistricting process. Legal challenges are ongoing in multiple states.
James Kravitz, freelance writer
Comments – Threads – Links
- Judge rules against civil rights groups in Georgia redistricting appeal – USA Today
- Judges will save the country. I get anxiety when people question Judges. Thanks Gab for not indulging-Carlos
- Headline should read Democrats trying to change rules again in their favor and judge denies them- Mr Obvious
- Hmmm, a judge just rubber-stamped a map that totally doesn’t favor one party over the other. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that it happens to protect the GOP’s political control. No gerrymandering to see here, folks- Fairly Impartial
- It’s sad you are considered a hero for doing the right thing once- RebeccaErwin Spencer
- I guess that will make it even harder for democrats to cheat in elections- Large Prime Numbers