David Zweig’s provides the receipts from a filing by the AMA in the Missouri v. Biden case. The American medical establishment seems dead set determined to torch what little credibility it has.
Story is below, but seriously – everything you need to know about the all-important case is explained in this video by Tracy Beanz, who is always on point.
Investigative Journalist Tracy Beanz Breaks Down Missouri V. Biden
The battle against government censorship is at the heart of our democracy. In Missouri v. Biden, we exposed a conspiracy to silence conservative voices. Now, the Supreme Court, in another case, NRA v. Vullo, is set to decide whether regulators can use financial reprisals to stifle dissent. This isn’t just about the NRA; it’s about the bedrock of our nation—free speech. I won’t let unconstitutional censorship stand. – Andrew Bailey
In a significant legal battle for the protection of First Amendment rights, the Supreme Court is poised to hear the case of Missouri v. Biden in March, as revealed by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey. In an interview with The Epoch Times, Mr. Bailey, a Republican, expressed his anticipation of oral arguments taking place within the next few months, with a potential decision expected as early as June. Currently, Bailey’s office is diligently preparing its briefing for the Supreme Court, aiming to submit it within the coming weeks.
Biden has repeatedly been found to have violated the Constitution and remains the most anti-free speech president since Adams. Given that record, Biden’s effort dress himself up as George Washington left him looking foolish in a uniform two sizes too big for his stature- Jonathan Turley
The core argument in Missouri v. Biden, a free speech lawsuit initiated by Missouri’s attorney general, alleges that the U.S. federal government collaborated with major tech firms, such as Google, Facebook, and the social media platform X (formerly Twitter), to stifle politically dissenting speech during the 2020 presidential campaign. The suit contends that these tech companies, under alleged pressure from the Biden administration, labeled certain content as “disinformation,” “misinformation,” or “malinformation,” specifically targeting information critical of then Vice President Joe Biden’s candidacy.
Big Medicine sides with Big Government in Missouri v. Biden to support censorship… Rand Paul
The lawsuit further accuses the Biden administration of suppressing negative news related to President Biden and his son Hunter Biden, content addressing the COVID-19 lab leak theory, vaccine efficacy, and commentary questioning the integrity of the 2020 election and mail-in voting, among other issues.
Joe Biden compares Donald Trump to Nazi Germany.pic.twitter.com/LkCWcRpze3
— Proud Elephant 🇺🇸🦅 (@ProudElephantUS) January 6, 2024
Originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, the case received a preliminary injunction order in July 2023. Despite subsequent appeals, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the injunction in September 2023. However, in October 2023, the Supreme Court stayed the injunction, signaling its decision to hear the Biden administration’s appeal.
Missouri v. Biden case “discovery has demonstrated an active and wide-ranging effort to censor and target Americans based on their thoughts and speech.” – Uncover DC
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey clarified that the primary objective of the upcoming proceedings is to secure a nationwide injunction preventing the federal government from dictating acceptable speech to technology companies. While the case is still in its preliminary stages, Bailey envisions an expansion of efforts if the Supreme Court affirms the decisions of lower courts, intending to address what he perceives as a vast censorship enterprise.
“Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter, the release of the Twitter Files, and the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit revealed how widespread and near-total the Western establishment’s control of the media environment was and is. The picture it presents of itself as neutral, objective, and balanced is a lie. The media and political establishment are anti-populist, elitist, and anti-democratic. They deeply resent the rise of new independent voices through social media because they have long held undeserved influence over what ideas can be discussed, what’s important, and who can hold elected office.” – Shellenberger
Bailey emphasized that the outcome of Missouri v. Biden could have a profound impact on the political landscape of the 2024 election, particularly if the U.S. government is legally prohibited from engaging in what he terms a “vast censorship enterprise.”
Briefs of Missouri v. Biden dubiously allege that blocking the government/social media collusion may undermine public health, national security, and the First Amendment.https://t.co/6EMBwXx5FI
— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) January 3, 2024
Simultaneously, the Missouri Attorney General’s office is actively involved in a case against Media Matters, alleging deceptive practices aimed at raising funds. Additionally, Bailey’s office played a pivotal role in pressuring former St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner to resign in May 2023, following allegations of selective prosecution and misconduct. Bailey asserted that this action was essential to restoring the rule of law and ensuring justice for victims in St. Louis and the surrounding region. Continued below the Maher Vid
Bill Maher and Seth McFarlane debate scientific expertise and censorship. McFarlane advocates for censorship and listening to the experts. Bill Maher cites the Barrington Declaration and Missouri v Biden
Bill Maher and Seth McFarlane debate scientific expertise and censorship. McFarlane advocates for censorship and listening to the experts. Bill Maher cites the Barrington Declaration and Missouri v Biden pic.twitter.com/1EZOSS5pru
— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) December 30, 2023
Regarding transgender issues, Bailey expressed pride in his office’s work during 2023, particularly in cases related to what he termed the “transgender child sterilization industry.” Notable victories include a case against the Wentzville School District’s Board of Education for concealing its transgender bathroom policy and an investigation into the practices of the Washington University Transgender Center, ultimately leading to a statewide ban on gender reassignment surgeries for minors.
Missouri AG Andrew Bailey: The Supreme Court must protect free speech: "Regulators have enormous power over our lives. If speaking out on public issues in opposition to government officials means they can cut off access to financial services, our country… https://t.co/C1R4VXdePc pic.twitter.com/lSIgsUsL9l
— Mark Truett (@markt36264) January 2, 2024
Looking ahead to 2024, Bailey outlined the office’s focus on supporting local prosecutors and law enforcement agencies in addressing violent offenders and investigating fraud to safeguard taxpayer dollars. In 2023, the Missouri Attorney General’s office’s efforts in combating Medicare fraud and consumer protection resulted in substantial financial recoveries, benefitting Missouri families impacted by deceptive business practices. Bailey highlighted these achievements as crucial steps in returning funds to hardworking Missouri families.
Here is a handy map of the states currently fighting for censorship in an attempt to overturn the Supreme Court Missouri v. Biden ruling. One set of battle lines was drawn.
Major Points Discussed:
- The Biden Administration continues to do all it can to censor American Conservatives. Recently labelling all supporters of Trump ‘extremists’, when it is now becoming more and more apparent daily, it is Biden, those that pull his strings like Obama, who are the real threat to freedom in the United States.
- Missouri v. Biden, a pivotal First Amendment case, is scheduled for Supreme Court hearings in March, with a decision expected by June.
- Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey asserts that the U.S. government conspired with major tech firms, including Google and Facebook, to suppress politically dissenting speech during the 2020 election by labeling it as “disinformation,” “misinformation,” or “malinformation.”
- The case originated in the U.S. District Court, received a preliminary injunction in July 2023, was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals in September 2023, and is now slated for Supreme Court review after a stay was placed on the injunction in October 2023.
- Bailey aims to establish a nationwide injunction preventing the government from dictating acceptable speech to tech companies, addressing what he sees as a broader “censorship enterprise.”
- The outcome of Missouri v. Biden could reshape the political landscape for the 2024 election, particularly concerning the government’s role in what Bailey calls a “vast censorship enterprise.” Additionally, Bailey’s office is actively involved in cases against Media Matters and has been instrumental in legal actions related to transgender issues and the removal of a Soros-backed prosecutor.
Comments – Threads – Links
- Missouri v. Biden ruled that administration officials “likely violated” the First Amendment, with the 5th Circuit issuing a preliminary injunction that bans the federal government from communicating with social media companies to limit speech. Bob Ferguson – who is claiming to support democracy and our essential freedoms – is using his office as Attorney General to try and reverse the 5th Circuit decision. He is doing this so his buddy, Steve Hobbs in the Secretary of State’s office, can maintain a contract with
@LogicallyAI to monitor the free speech of high-profile Republicans in Washington State, including our WAGOP Chairman. This is how Democrats handle democracy in Olympia. – Washington State GOP
- Now that’s telling it like it is. There is no comparison between Corrupt Joe and George Washington the father of this great nation- Eric
- Biden’s closer to Stalin than Washington. Terrible. And the constant lies. Unbelievable that Americans tolerate it- Ray
- Biden is trying to throw his opponent in prison, his DOJ is targeting Catholics & concerned parents, and his allies are trying to take Trump off the ballot. Yet he’s lecturing us that “democracy is at stake” in 2024. Audacious!- Michael Kilby
- Censorship is part of control. Control of information in a free society makes it unfree. Denying freedom in American society by government is against the laws of the land. Seems like thos could be some sort of treason- Lee Lamb
- We are truly living in George Orwell-land when blocking free speech is used as justification to protect the First Amendment- SUUUUURE You Won
News Junkies Delight…. One visit and you are hooked…. Come over to Whatfinger’s main page. All news and more news than any other site on the net.
