Monday, November 25
    News Junkie Paradise – Whatfinger News - More news daily than any other news site on Earth - CLICK HERE

    Presidential Hopeful Nikki Haley Backs Alabama Supreme Court on IVF Embryos as Living Beings: Legal and Ethical Dimensions Unveiled

    JimBy Updated: Whatfinger News 7 Mins Read

    Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley sides with Alabama Supreme Court on IVF ruling. During an exclusive NBC interview on Wednesday she said, “Embryos, to me, are babies.”

    Nikki Haley treads carefully on the campaign trail on the issues of abortion and reproductive rights — and she’s now walking back comments she made about the Alabama Supreme Court ruling that said frozen embryos created through IVF are children. – See fast 1 min clip below

    Just the Facts…

    • Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley refers to frozen embryos from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) as “babies,” aligning with a recent Alabama Supreme Court decision.
    • Haley, having used artificial insemination for her son, differentiates it from IVF, emphasizing her view of embryos as lives.
    • The classification of embryos as children could challenge the continuation of IVF practices, especially in states like Alabama, due to potential legal repercussions for destroying unused embryos.
    • The University of Alabama at Birmingham paused IVF treatments in light of the Alabama Supreme Court ruling, citing concerns over potential criminal prosecution or punitive damages for patients and physicians adhering to standard IVF care.
    • Haley calls for sensitivity and respect in discussions about IVF and reproductive health, emphasizing the importance of informed decision-making by women and their partners.
    • As a 2024 presidential candidate, Haley seeks a middle ground on reproductive health policy, advocating for a national “consensus” on abortion over the bans and restrictions preferred by some competitors.

    Presidential hopeful Nikki Haley, a member of the GOP, recently voiced her support for a significant Alabama Supreme Court ruling that categorized embryos produced through in-vitro fertilization (IVF) as living entities. The decision, issued on February 16, emerged from a lawsuit wherein plaintiffs sought damages for embryos stored at a cryogenic facility that suffered destruction.

    Nikki Haley is siding with the recent Alabama Supreme Court decision that frozen embryos created through IVF are considered children under state law. According to the decision, people in Alabama could be theoretically sued for destroying a frozen embryo- NBC News

    Ms. Haley, a staunch pro-life advocate, asserted her belief that embryos should be considered as babies, drawing a personal connection by revealing that her own son, Nalin Haley, was conceived through artificial insemination. “Embryos to me are babies,” she affirmed in an interview with NBC News on February 21. While acknowledging the sensitivity and personal nature of discussions around IVF, Ms. Haley expressed understanding for the Alabama Supreme Court’s perspective, emphasizing the gravity of considering embryos as lives.

    In this legal dispute, a group of couples pursued action against a fertility clinic operated by the Center for Reproductive Medicine. Their grievance stemmed from a period between 2013 and 2016 when they underwent IVF treatments at the clinic. The clinic successfully combined eggs and sperm outside the womb, allowing embryos to develop for a brief period before placing them in a cryogenic nursery designed to maintain their vitality at a fixed developmental stage.

    The Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling hinged on whether unborn children, situated outside a biological uterus at the time of termination, were exempt from the Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. The court, in a 7–2 decision, unequivocally declared that the Act applies universally to all unborn children, irrespective of their location.

    The court contended that neither the text of the Wrongful Death of a Minor Act nor its prior decisions excluded extrauterine children from its coverage. It maintained that unborn children qualified as ‘children’ under the Act without exceptions related to developmental stage, physical location, or other ancillary characteristics.

    The plaintiffs raised concerns about the potential exclusion of extrauterine children from the Act, arguing that such an exemption would deprive parents of any civil remedy against those responsible for killing their unborn child after it had left the uterus but before full delivery from the birth canal. Moreover, they cautioned that this exemption could give rise to significant constitutional questions.

    Conversely, the defendants, including the fertility clinic, contended that embryos did not meet the criteria for being recognized as children or people. Their argument, as outlined in the majority opinion, suggested that failing to create an exemption for extrauterine children would result in undesirable outcomes, significantly increasing the cost of IVF in Alabama and making cryogenic preservation financially burdensome.

    The court, however, firmly asserted that policy-focused arguments regarding the economic implications of their decision were beyond its purview. Judges, it stressed, are mandated to base their rulings on the law and the Constitution, refraining from crafting new limitations based on personal views of public policy.

    Ms. Haley’s advocacy for a sensitive approach to the IVF issue aligns with her stance on abortion, emphasizing the need for respectful dialogue and consensus on such contentious matters. As the debate surrounding the status of embryos continues, it underscores the intricate interplay between legal, ethical, and personal considerations in the realm of reproductive technology.

    None of this is expected to help her in her contest with President Trump.  Her backing by the Deep State, most media and the Democrat Party as well as Democrat billionaire donors makes her the enemy of MAGA, and as such she is unelectable in our eyes.

    Major Points Discussed:

    • Nikki Haley, GOP presidential candidate, supports an Alabama Supreme Court decision classifying IVF embryos as living beings, citing personal connection through her son’s artificial insemination.
    • The Alabama Supreme Court, in a 7–2 ruling, affirmed that the Wrongful Death of a Minor Act applies universally to unborn children, irrespective of their location, stating embryos are ‘children’ without exceptions.
    • The ruling stemmed from a lawsuit involving couples seeking damages for embryos destroyed at a cryogenic facility operated by the Center for Reproductive Medicine during IVF treatments between 2013 and 2016.
    • Plaintiffs argued against excluding extrauterine children from the Act, warning it could deprive parents of legal remedies and raise constitutional concerns, while defendants, including the fertility clinic, contended embryos didn’t qualify as children.
    • The court emphasized its role in interpreting the law and Constitution, rejecting policy-focused arguments and highlighting the need for respectful dialogue on sensitive issues like IVF and abortion.

    Comments – Threads – Links

    • Should frozen embryos be considered children under the law, and what implications might this have for the rights of the individuals involved in the IVF process?- Fairly Impartial
    • The literal ONLY good thing that she has said her entire career- i_am
    • So, if my wife and I have frozen embryos at the clinic, do we get to claim them on our taxes? If they are considered children shouldn’t we get the tax breaks?- Paul P. #ALLY
    • This here proves she is not sympathetic to women and widens healthcare. I realize IVF is more complicated, but this is the ultimate goal complete control of what women can and cannot do with their bodies. All under the guise of protecting life- kmp
    • Ask Nikki Haley, what happened to the rest of the embryos after her fertility treatment- Eileen McLaughlin
    Biden and crew are doing everything possible to take the nation down. Nations and banks around the world are buying Gold fast and at record amounts.  Do yourself or your family a favor, check out GOLD now – Whatfinger endorses Goldco, which has helped people all over America to protect their 401Ks and retirement – get the free details –  CLICK HERE or below…
    News Junkies Delight…. One visit and you are hooked….  Come over to Whatfinger’s main page. All news and more news than any other site on the net. 

    Keep Reading

    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply