The Dan Hurley drama. Some seem to take the opinion that ‘how dare he’ not jump at the opportunity. Not everyone is taken in by the glitz and fame of the NBA or any sporting outlet.
When Dan Hurley declined the Los Angeles Lakers’ coaching offer, it ignited a broader debate about the attractiveness of coaching positions within the NBA, particularly for a high-profile team like the Lakers. Despite the allure of the Lakers’ brand, the actual job might not be as appealing as it seems. Insights from league sources indicate a general perception that the position is less desirable due to several challenges including financial limitations of the ownership, a front office that has struggled with roster construction, and the restrictions imposed by the new Collective Bargaining Agreement.
The Lakers will interview JR Smith for a coaching position, per @SharmsCharania pic.twitter.com/swwqccqndO
— NBACentel (@TheNBACentel) June 11, 2024
This situation raises fundamental questions about what constitutes a desirable NBA coaching job and how each team ranks in terms of attractiveness to potential coaches. To assess this, one could consider a variety of factors devoid of salary implications or market size, focusing instead on the stability of the team’s ownership, the willingness of the owners to invest in the team, the competence of the front office, job security, the current talent on the roster, and the team’s potential for long-term success.
Top of the list in desirability is the Oklahoma City Thunder, praised for its ownership, management by Sam Presti, and a strong young roster backed by an impressive collection of draft picks. On the other hand, the Boston Celtics and Denver Nuggets also rank highly due to their robust rosters and front office stability.
The Lakers couldn’t even hire a college coach that has dreamed of coaching in the NBA 😭 pic.twitter.com/HuHgUIztn1
— CBB Content (@CBBcontent) June 10, 2024
Conversely, teams like the New York Knicks and Dallas Mavericks have had fluctuating fortunes that reflect changes in management and ownership that impact their ranking. Stability and potential for long-term success play significant roles in how desirable these coaching positions are.
At the lower end of the spectrum, teams like the Philadelphia 76ers and Miami Heat present certain challenges. The 76ers deal with the uncertainties of Joel Embiid’s health and a somewhat volatile roster, while the Heat have a stable organizational structure but face financial constraints.
The Lakers are a play-in team every year. The coaching job is not a great one.
via @ZachLowe_NBA
— 🦉 Lakers Vino (@VinoUncorked) June 11, 2024
Overall, the ranking of NBA coaching jobs fluctuates based on a combination of management stability, financial health, roster potential, and other critical factors that contribute to the overall desirability of the coaching position.
Major Points
- Dan Hurley declined the coaching position with the Los Angeles Lakers, sparking discussion on the true desirability of this high-profile NBA job.
- Concerns about the Lakers include financial limitations of the ownership, a less effective front office, and constraints from the new CBA affecting team composition.
- The article ranks NBA coaching positions by factors like ownership stability, willingness to invest, front office effectiveness, roster talent, and long-term success potential.
- Top teams like the Oklahoma City Thunder, Boston Celtics, and Denver Nuggets are highlighted for their strong management, ownership, and promising rosters.
- Less desirable positions, such as with the Philadelphia 76ers and Miami Heat, face issues like player health uncertainties and financial constraints.
RM Tomi – Reprinted with permission of Whatfinger News
