What a tangled web they weave, when all they do is deceive. America has had it with the Left and Deep State.
In the wake of the formal approval of the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden’s conduct, Washington finds itself gripped by alarm and denial. Despite widespread evidence pointing to a multi-million-dollar influence-peddling operation involving the Biden family, not a single Democratic member supported an inquiry into these allegations. As the House moves forward, it is essential to dispel three pervasive myths that have permeated the discourse, myths that lack legal or factual support but have been eagerly propagated in the media.
The Three Myths Of The Biden Impeachment Defense
That not a single Democrat is demanding answers about this corruption is disappointing but hardly surprisinghttps://t.co/buhGYfztj1— Trumpish Retired NCO (@virgofiveeight) December 15, 2023
Contrary to the narrative that suggests President Biden was untouched by the influence peddling, recent revelations confirm the long-standing involvement of Hunter Biden and his uncles in this dubious practice. Even though the media and some Democrats initially suppressed this scandal, testimony from Biden associates now admits to selling “the Biden Brand,” with the President regularly participating in meetings with business associates.
“The Three Myths Of The Biden Impeachment Defense” Despite overwhelming evidence of a corrupt Biden family influence-peddling operation worth millions of dollars, not a single Democratic member voted for an inquiry into the allegations. Mike Novax
The defense argument that Joe Biden did not directly benefit from the money, unlike his children, brothers, and grandchildren, is contradicted by legal precedent. Courts have consistently rejected such claims in criminal cases, considering payments to family members as benefits to the defendant. Drawing on the experience of a lead counsel in a previous judicial impeachment, where benefits received by a judge’s children were central, it is clear that such benefits are relevant in impeachment proceedings as well.
Some Democrats persist in characterizing the influence-peddling operation as a byproduct of Hunter Biden’s addiction. This argument, however, fails to hold up under scrutiny. Even if Hunter were grappling with addiction, it underscores the fact that foreign figures were providing millions for access to his father, not for the advice or expertise of his son.
“Three myths of the Biden Impeachment Defense …Joe Biden did not benefit from the influence peddling …It’s about Hunter Biden’s addictions, not actions …It’s all about Hunter’s truck …ignoring the millions the committees detailed in months of investigation”
Hunter’s own legal defense weakens this claim, as it argues that he had emerged from addiction just in time to sign an allegedly false gun form. The evidence reveals a calculated effort involving Hunter’s uncles and, in some instances, his father, debunking the notion that he was not responsible for these transactions or the underlying influence peddling.
A recent myth gaining traction involves payments from Hunter’s business accounts to the President, purportedly for truck-related expenses. While the House Oversight Committee highlighted these payments to demonstrate personal use of business accounts, Democrats and the media downplayed them as insignificant, attributing them to a “father’s love” rather than anything impeachable.
Trump "Legal Defense" Biggest Expense — Mar-A-Lago
Not a penny spent for legal defense. Trump hammers Iowa governor for lack of "loyalty" — has he helped J6ers or spent legal defense on lavish parties he pays himself for? And Biden impeachment begins with his most serious… pic.twitter.com/trq6qFdHSw— David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F (@libertytarian) December 14, 2023
This narrative, however, conveniently shifts focus from the millions detailed in months of investigation to a few thousand dollars related to alleged truck payments. The intermingling of funds in these accounts, including payments to Hunter’s father, challenges the notion that the impeachment inquiry is
centered solely on trivial transactions. The broader issue is the potential use of influence-peddling proceeds to financially support the President and his family.
Update: The U.S. House has voted to officially initiate an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden!! If this was Trump they would have impeached him without an investigation! US Civil Defense News
In light of these myths, it is crucial to emphasize that the impeachment inquiry aims not at immediate impeachment but at eliciting answers. The focus should be on unveiling the truth behind the Biden family’s influence-peddling operation. As the House moves forward to compel testimony from key parties, it is imperative to dismantle these illusory defenses.
The reluctance of any Democrat to demand answers about the alleged corruption is disheartening but unsurprising given our partisan climate. However, with the initiation of an impeachment inquiry, the spotlight is now on obtaining real answers rather than perpetuating misleading myths.
The Three Myths Of The Biden Impeachment Defense Millennial Conservative
President Biden faces a serious inquiry that delves into the intricacies of the influence-peddling operation involving his family. The ultimate question is not whether he directly received payments but rather the extent of his knowledge and involvement in these activities. By unraveling these myths and focusing on the substantive issues at hand, the inquiry can fulfill its purpose of seeking truth and accountability.
As the House proceeds with its investigation, it is essential for lawmakers to rise above partisan divides and objectively assess the evidence. Only by dismantling these myths and examining the facts can a fair and just conclusion be reached. The American people deserve transparency, and a thorough examination of the evidence will contribute to rebuilding trust in the democratic process.
- Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs – get approved over the phone – Dr. McCullough’s company!) 🛑
- Get the Spike Control formula to help you clean your blood out of spike proteins from the vaccine. Proven to clean blood and save lives. 👍 – Whatfinger Sponsor
To Sum it all up: the Biden impeachment inquiry is not founded on baseless accusations but on substantial evidence of a potentially corrupt influence-peddling operation. Dispelling the myths surrounding the President’s alleged involvement is crucial for a fair and transparent investigation. As the process unfolds, it is incumbent upon lawmakers to uphold the principles of justice and accountability, setting aside partisan considerations in pursuit of the truth.
Major Points Discussed:
- Recent revelations acknowledge the Biden family’s involvement in a multi-million-dollar influence-peddling operation, contradicting initial suppression by the media and some Democrats.
- Despite claims that Joe Biden did not directly benefit from the money, legal precedents and impeachment history suggest that payments to family members can be considered as benefiting the defendant.
- Democrats asserting that Hunter Biden’s actions were driven by addiction are countered by evidence showing calculated efforts and involvement by family members, including the President, during periods of claimed sobriety.
- A myth suggesting that the impeachment inquiry revolves around insignificant truck-related payments conveniently diverts attention from the broader issue of millions detailed in the investigation, challenging the narrative that these transactions are inconsequential.
- Emphasizing that the impeachment inquiry aims to elicit answers, not immediate impeachment, underscores the need for transparency and truth regarding the Biden family’s influence-peddling, shifting the focus from partisan divides to accountability and justice.
James Kravitz, freelance writer for Whatfinger News
Comments – Threads – Links
- Democrats voted unanimously to stop any further investigation into the Biden corruption scandal. Even in our blindly partisan times, that is no easy rationalization. That’s why members are continuing to repeat three myths like a mantra on the Hill. – Jonathan Turley
- The Three Myths of the Biden Impeachment Defense – JONATHAN TURLEY. Excellent article laying out facts and legal reasoning for articles of impeachment and the Dems/media attempts to dismiss the evidence and influence and bribery crimes committed by Joe – Mitch
- “Even if Hunter was some addict thinking only about his next fix, it only highlights that these foreign figures were giving millions for access to his father, not the advice or expertise of his son.” The Three Myths of the Biden Impeachment Defense – BlindFaithBook
- The Three Myths of the Biden Impeachment Defense. That not a single Democrat is demanding answers about this corruption is disappointing but hardly surprising. – Frank Stephens ~ Constitutionali
- The Biden Impeachment Inquiry: A Heedless Descent into Constitutional Anarchy – The evidence-free push to impeach President Joe Biden. “Proceeding with this inquiry diminishes the utility of impeachment as a vital defense against authoritarian, criminal, or – Anna – Never give up. No matter what is going on!