Friday, November 8
    News Junkie Paradise – Whatfinger News - More news daily than any other news site on Earth - CLICK HERE

    The Unraveling Tapestry of Free Speech: Examining the Biden Administration’s Controversial Censorship Crusade and Its Impact on American Democracy

    Main EditorBy Updated: Whatfinger News 7 Mins Read


    In a controversial move that has sparked debates about the preservation of free speech in the United States, federal judge Terry Doughty, on July 4, 2023, condemned the Biden administration for what he deemed “the most massive attack against free speech in United States history.” This condemnation was later reinforced by a federal appeals court decision in September 2023, which determined that the Biden administration had orchestrated a broad campaign pressuring social media companies to suppress speech, viewpoints, and content disapproved by the government.

    Is Free Speech A Relic In America? Is the First Amendment becoming a historic relic? On July 4, 2023, federal judge Terry Doughty condemned the Biden administration for potentially “the most massive attack against free speech in United States history.”.. AustralianConservative

    Historically, such policies would have faced condemnation from across the political spectrum. However, prominent media outlets, including the Washington Post, have rallied to support the Biden administration’s efforts, framing it as a war against “misinformation.” Surprisingly, almost half of Democrats surveyed in September 2023 expressed the belief that free speech should be legal “only under certain circumstances,” reflecting a shifting perspective on this foundational democratic principle.

    Despite widespread support for federal censorship, courts have clearly outlined the government’s violations of the First Amendment. Judge Doughty detailed instances of federal coercion, manipulation, and pressure on social media companies, particularly in deleting Americans’ comments on topics such as Afghanistan, Ukraine, and election procedures. In response, an injunction was issued, preventing federal agencies from encouraging the removal of content containing protected free speech.

    “FINALLY, A JUDGE STANDS UP TO BIDEN’S ABUSE OF POWER & SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH” “Judge Doughty said that the evidence before him demonstrated ‘the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history’…”Steph Philip

    Censorship under the Biden administration began early in his tenure, with instances of pressuring platforms like Twitter to remove content, including a parody account of Biden’s relatives. Facebook also faced demands to delete humorous memes and suppress posts related to COVID vaccines, even those rooted in truth. The term “liberty” itself became a target for suppression, illustrating the lengths to which the government was willing to go to control the narrative.

    Is the First Amendment a historic relic? In July, federal judge Terry Doughty condemned the Biden administration for potentially “the most massive attack against free speech in United States history.” ~James Bovard Is Free Speech a Relic in America? Brownstone Institute

    The surge in censorship can be traced back to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Act, initially created to protect against foreign interference. However, this act has been repurposed to target American citizens, particularly during the 2020 and 2022 elections, resulting in the suppression of conservative voices on social media platforms.

    The COVID-19 pandemic provided further justification for censorship, with the government assuming that Americans would unquestioningly believe information encountered on platforms like Facebook. This mindset was evident in the administration’s attempts to monitor and control discussions about COVID-19 vaccines, even in the absence of comprehensive safety data for certain demographics.

    the Biden administration for potentially “the most massive attack against free speech in United States history. Markson Akan ♤

    The Biden administration’s defense centers on the distinction between persuasion and coercion, claiming that it merely engaged in legitimate efforts at persuasion. However, the appeals court saw through this argument, acknowledging the subtle strong-arming and veiled threats employed by federal agencies to achieve compliance from social media platforms. The court’s decision concluded that these actions had the intended result of suppressing millions of protected free speech postings by American citizens.

    Top DOJ Official Clueless About Key Case In Missouri v. Biden U.S. District Court Judge Terry Doughty wrote that President Joe Biden and his fellow defendants likely committed “the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.” KansasValues

    As the case heads to the Supreme Court, the implications for the future of free speech in the U.S. are significant. The Biden administration’s appeal contends that there is a fundamental distinction between persuasion and coercion and urges the court to consider the drastic consequences of finding coercion. However, critics argue that the government cannot be allowed to stifle the protected speech of ordinary Americans under the guise of maintaining public order.

    The battle over federal censorship raises questions about the role of government in regulating speech and the potential impact on the democratic process, particularly as the 2024 presidential election looms. The Supreme Court’s decision, expected in the coming months, will undoubtedly shape the future landscape of free speech in the United States. As the legal proceedings unfold, Americans are left to contemplate the delicate balance between protecting public discourse and safeguarding individual liberties.

    Major Points Discussed:

    • Federal judge Terry Doughty criticized the Biden administration on July 4, 2023, labeling its actions as “the most massive attack against free speech in United States history.”
    • In September 2023, a federal appeals court upheld Doughty’s verdict, concluding that the Biden administration had pressured social media companies to suppress content and viewpoints disapproved by the government, marking a significant infringement on the First Amendment.
    • Mainstream media, including the Washington Post, has supported the Biden administration’s censorship efforts, framing it as a necessary battle against “misinformation.” Surprisingly, a September 2023 survey indicated that almost half of Democrats believe free speech should be legal “only under certain circumstances.”
    • Judge Doughty’s detailed findings revealed instances of federal coercion, manipulation, and pressure on social media companies, leading to an injunction preventing federal agencies from encouraging the removal of content containing protected free speech.
    • The COVID-19 pandemic provided a rationale for increased censorship, with the administration assuming that Americans would unquestioningly believe information encountered on platforms like Facebook. The administration’s attempts to control discussions about COVID-19 vaccines highlighted its willingness to suppress even truthful information.

    Susan Guglielmo, freelance writer

    Comments – Threads – Links

    • On July 4, 2023, federal judge Terry Doughty condemned the Biden regime for “the most massive attack against free speech in US history.” But MSM like the Washington Post have rushed to the barricades to defend the Biden war on “misinformation.”  – shameonfed
    • Will you do the same if a court rules that the Biden Administration is guilty of the most massive attack against free speech in the history of the United States? You know, the most important law of our land – Pitt Fan 1
    • This administration has tried numerous ways to normalize censorship under the guise of “combating misinformation.” Missouri v Biden was “the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.” This is exactly why city councils, state legislatures, and Congress should draft and enact legislation protecting the data of their constituents and safeguarding our right to free expression on the Internet. – Corban Qualls
    • BOMBSHELL: New Report Details How the Federal Government Partnered with Universities to Censor Americans’ Speech – Weaponization Committee

    Biden and crew are doing everything possible to take the nation down. Nations and banks around the world are buying Gold fast and at record amounts.  Do yourself or your family a favor, check out GOLD now – Whatfinger endorses Goldco, which has helped people all over America to protect their 401Ks and retirement – get the free details –  CLICK HERE or below…

    Keep Reading

    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply