Crime Is So Out Of Control In Democrat Run Oregon That Jackson Food Stores Now Make You Scan Your Face Before Entering You must stand in a specific spot, the speaker says “Please look at camera for entry” and facial recognition is used to let you into the store to buy food. Fast clip
Crime Is So Out Of Control In Democrat Run Oregon That Jackson Food Stores Now Make You Scan Your Face Before Entering
You must stand in a specific spot, the speaker says “Please look at camera for entry” and facial recognition is used to let you into the store to buy food. pic.twitter.com/VGLelUfgfE
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) January 17, 2024
A coalition of 18 senators, including Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) and Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), recently penned a letter to the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing apprehensions about the potential reinforcement of racial bias within the criminal justice system through the use of facial recognition software. The senators, in their communication dated January 18, highlighted the widespread adoption of facial recognition technology in law enforcement, particularly by the FBI’s Facial Analysis, Comparison, and Evaluation unit, which boasts access to an extensive database of over 641 million photographs.
Don’t worry. The rest of them are wholly unconcerned about our rights and the executive brach- well they have never met a civil right they don’t want to violate- WhiteTiger
The senators emphasized their concerns regarding the reliability and accuracy of these technologies, especially concerning issues related to race and ethnicity. In their letter addressed to Attorney General Merrick Garland, they pointed out that facial recognition software could lead to violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The senators drew attention to instances where individuals, particularly from the black community, have faced wrongful arrests based on inaccurate facial recognition matches, citing the case of Randal Quran Reid, a Georgia resident wrongly accused of retail theft in Louisiana in 2022.
The senators underscored that Title VI prohibits both intentional discrimination and discriminatory effects, restricting the deployment of programs or technologies that may result in discrimination by grant recipients funded by agencies like the DOJ. They voiced their concerns over the potential reinforcement of racial bias within the criminal justice system, emphasizing the life-altering impact that errors in facial recognition technology can have on American citizens.
A group of 18 senators sent the Department of Justice a letter Thursday raising concerns about the agency’s funding and oversight of what they called “frequently inaccurate” facial recognition software. https://t.co/rYztQikyVI
— The Record From Recorded Future News (@TheRecord_Media) January 19, 2024
Highlighting the less accurate performance of facial recognition technology when analyzing dark-skinned faces, the senators referred to studies, including one by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which indicated a higher likelihood of misidentification of black, Native American, and Asian individuals. They expressed deep concern that faulty evidence resulting from facial recognition errors could contribute to wrongful arrests and urged the DOJ to address these issues promptly.
To further hold the DOJ accountable, the senators posed a series of questions to be answered by February 29. These questions included inquiries about the department’s analysis of the extent to which federal grant recipients are utilizing facial recognition technology in compliance with existing laws.
This should prompt DOJ, state AGs & civil rights groups to investigate & challenge facial recognition policing by retailers as a § 1981 and state public accommodations law issue–areas where algorithmic antidiscrimination law remains underdeveloped due to a lack of enforcement- Clarence Okoh
The senators’ concerns align with recent actions taken against the misuse of facial recognition technology. In December 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) imposed a five-year ban on drugstore chain Rite Aid from using facial recognition for surveillance purposes. The FTC cited the retailer’s “reckless” use of AI-based facial recognition technology from 2012 to 2020, highlighting its failure to take reasonable measures to prevent harm to consumers.
The FTC complaint detailed instances where Rite Aid employees acted on false positive alerts, leading to unwarranted searches, confrontations, and accusations against customers, disproportionately impacting people of color. The FTC emphasized the humiliation and harm faced by customers and the risk to sensitive information due to Rite Aid’s violation of orders.
In response, Rite Aid clarified that the mentioned technology was part of a limited pilot program and expressed commitment to addressing the concerns raised by the FTC.
18 senators have asked DOJ to investigate whether the use of facial recognition tech by agencies/orgs they fund violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Senators say they're "deeply concerned" and demand answers on related DOJ practices in letter to the AG https://t.co/RFinwMML7U
— Suzanne Smalley (@SuzanneMSmalley) January 19, 2024
To Sum it all up: the senators’ letter underscores the urgent need for accountability and transparency in the use of facial recognition technology, particularly in law enforcement. The actions taken against Rite Aid serve as a stark reminder of the potential harms associated with the reckless deployment of such technology, prompting a broader conversation about safeguards, regulations, and ethical considerations in its use.
- Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs – get approved over the phone – Dr. McCullough’s company!) 🛑
- Get the Spike Control formula to help you clean your blood out of spike proteins from the vaccine. Proven to clean blood and save lives. 👍 – Whatfinger Sponsor
Major Points Discussed:
- A group of 18 senators, led by Sen. Raphael Warnock and Sen. Dick Durbin, expressed concerns about racial bias in the criminal justice system due to the use of facial recognition software.
- They emphasized the widespread deployment of facial recognition technology by the FBI, with access to over 641 million photographs, but raised alarms about its unreliability, especially regarding race and ethnicity.
- The senators argued that the use of certain biometric technologies could potentially violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, citing instances of individuals, particularly from the Black community, being wrongly arrested based on faulty facial recognition matches.
- The letter called for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to respond to a set of questions by February 29, including an assessment of the extent to which federal grant recipients are using facial recognition technology in compliance with existing laws.
- In a related development, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned Rite Aid from using facial recognition for surveillance for five years, citing the company’s “reckless” use of the technology and its disproportionate impact on people of color.
Comments – Threads – Links
- How facial recognition works – fast clip see below lol
How facial recognition works 🤪😂 pic.twitter.com/ER1BF0LBQj
— Jayne Potvin (@Fisherlady111) January 16, 2024
- In China’s 15-minute cities, you can get arrested when you leave the zone which you are registered to live without police permission. And facial recognition has been deployed to stop people from leaving without authority permission. – see clip below
In China’s 15-minute cities, you can get arrested when you leave the zone which you are registered to live without police permission.
And facial recognition has been deployed to stop people from leaving without authority permission. https://t.co/GdhDmsAKIN pic.twitter.com/7wtlDBtkOg
— Songpinganq (@songpinganq) January 21, 2024
- Why the doj? Who trusts them anymore?- Judy
- But the illegals trying to fly can just say no?- Tee Cee
- I got a payout from a class action against a company I worked for that used a biometric fingerprint log-in for clocking in and out. This was within the confines of a private business though- Farts𐊨fPoseidon DRiP